Title: Vaccinations, A Word of Caution for our Animals | |
greatdanefun > Library > Health Issues | Go to subcategory: |
Author | Content |
gdfadmin | |
Date Posted:01/26/2009 3:42 PMCopy HTML Why
do we vaccinate our pets every year, but not ourselves??? How necessary is this
practice and could you be risking your pets health
doing so? Vaccinations: A Word of Caution for Our Animals Part I by Will Falconer, DVM Certified Veterinary Homeopath Web site: www.Alt4Animals.com
Vaccinations: If someone, even someone
in a white coat, suggests that you take a drug or get injected with some
substance, two logical questions ought to immediately arise in your
mind: 1. Is this beneficial to
me (or does this work as intended)? 2. Is this
safe? If we ask these two
questions about annual revaccination of animals, and we ask the right people,
we’ll get a negative answer to both. We’ve already covered the first question in
part I:
efficacy of annual revaccination is clearly lacking according to immunologists.
A more important question is the safety issue, as a growing body of evidence
mounts showing a correlation between vaccinations and chronic
disease. The chronic diseases have
many names, including arthritis, hypo- or hyperthyroidism, allergies, asthma,
inflammatory bowel disease, repeated ear infections, skin disease, heart
disease, diabetes, kidney failure, and cancer. What makes them nightmarish is
that they linger, they are not easily cured, and they are slowly, progressively
degenerative, meaning the patient declines in health over the time they are
present. The best that conventional medicine can do with chronic disease is to
control symptoms through suppressive therapies. This is fraught with problems,
including side effects from the drugs, and apparently “new,” more serious
diseases arising from the continued course of suppression. So, our greatest goal
as animal caretakers should be to prevent chronic disease in the first
place. The onset of chronic
disease after vaccination is often delayed, coming about 1-2 months afterwards.
This is not close enough for conventional medical minds to appreciate the
correlation, but it’s there nonetheless. The evidence of this comes from both
anecdotal sources and research studies. A British veterinarian
has, for the last 10-12 years, asked those clients who present him with an
itchy, allergic dog, “When did this itchiness begin?” The response is striking.
Some 75% remember clearly: it began within 1-2 months of the “puppy shots.”
Anecdotal evidence in human medicine is pointing to a cause and effect
relationship between childhood vaccines and autism. There has been a marked
increase in incidence of this devastating disease that parallels the increased
number of vaccinations now required of children. The interval
between vaccination and disease? About one month. In a research study
published in 1996, the authors looked at a deadly canine disease of a confused
immune system. Known as immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), it means the
dogs’ immune systems attacked their own red blood cells as if they were foreign.
Needless to say, this is life-challenging and the death rate is high, as one
cannot live long without the oxygen-carrying red blood cells. In the study, 58
dogs with the illness, presenting at a veterinary teaching hospital over a two
year period, were compared to a control group presenting for other problems over
the same time. The question was asked, “Did anything precede the onset of IMHA?”
Lo and behold, a highly statistically significant group of the sick dogs had
been vaccinated with the usual yearly vaccines one month earlier. It was so
significant that the authors entitled their paper, “Vaccine-Associated
Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in the Dog.” (Duval and Giger, J Vet Intern Med
1996;10:290-295) In cats, researchers have
known for the last ten years about the correlation between vaccines and a
malignant tumor. This particular tumor arises where the vaccines are commonly
given, in the area of loose skin at the back of the neck, or in the back of the
hind leg. It appears to be uniformly fatal, even with extensive surgery. And it
has been clearly associated with two particular vaccines, rabies and feline
leukemia. Finally, in 2000, recognizing the clear cause and effect relationship
between vaccination and this cancer, the disease was renamed by the research
community. It is now officially called Vaccine- Associated
Sarcoma. In the early days of
homeopathic veterinary practice, a number of us would see something we would
later call the “vaccinosis phenomenon.” It was instructive to us as to just how
significant an impact vaccinations had had on our
animal patients. We would be presented with a chronically ill animal, and after
carefully choosing and giving the appropriate homeopathic remedy, we’d be met
with disappointing results. A second or third prescription would be made with
similar dismal responses from the patient. Finally, we’d go back to the owner
and ask about vaccinations. Inevitably the patient was vaccinated. “Whenever we
got the reminder postcard, we went in for the shots.” Then we would reanalyze
the case in light of this knowledge, and look at remedies that were particularly
noted to have been applicable in illness that arose after vaccination. When we’d
prescribe again with a “vaccinosis” remedy, the results were often startling.
Not only would the disease symptoms lessen by 50% or more, but the patient would
start acting more normally. The dog who was hyperactive
would settle down and pay attention, the angry cat would become a lover again,
or the animal terrified of visitors would come out and say hello. The owners
were so impressed with the changes that they would often call before the next
appointment to tell us how great things were going! The inference we have
made from this experience, repeated over and over in different parts of the
country in different practitioners’ hands, is simple: vaccinations are
responsible for a significant portion of the illness we see in the patients with
chronic disease. The veterinary profession
slowly continues to evaluate this practice of vaccinating annually. In 2000, the
American Association of Feline Practitioners came out with an official statement
against annual vaccination in the cat. They based this position on research from
Cornell where kittens, vaccinated once, measured seven years later still showing
evidence of immunity from those vaccines. Quite frankly
though, I don’t think we can afford to wait for the whole profession to catch
up. Our animals are at risk to become chronically ill if we continue this
baseless practice of annual revaccination. And, years from now when we look back
incredulously at how such a practice was ever thought to be wise, wouldn’t it be
nice to be able to smile and pat your healthy twenty-something pet and say, “We
knew. We stopped. That’s why you’re still here.” |